Geniuses who created “the logic of destruction”
In the modern society, under a single view of the world that should be called “superstition”, it is possible to die of destruction and catastrophe.
I, I ” ‘m struggling with tremendous prewar energy
What is the wrong view of the world?
It is a way of thinking that “the world always advances to a worthy state by knowledge and technology”. .
This is no longer a “thought” for the people of today’s developed countries.
“Because I am”, “I have become even hope L”.
This worldview is based on the idea that machines and technology are all-purpose, which in turn
It is a basic concept to configure. Let’s look at the life of a modern person that has come out of it.
Play is to play around the machine-electronic game created by electronic technology, entertainment is
It is a television and electronic music. The job is to adjust the monitor and the fine adjustment machine, and even the mouth
It is becoming ideal to have them act as substitutes for the boat. The daily activities are defined by the watch, the communication means is the telephone, and the housework is the cooker, the washing machine and other operations by electronic technology. , Calculator, co
With the help of computer and television, the word processor has made it unnecessary to write letters.
Travel is all machine-embraced life, as cars and jets compete for speed.
It is.
The basic idea is that as machines and technology progress, our lives are improved, improved and
It is said to flourish. And it will rise endlessly by improving human knowledge and technology
It is considered to be one that will continue.
The author of “The Law of Entropy”, J. Rifkin, created and decided on this view of the world:
As a human thinker, it is written as follows.
“Each view of the world has its builder. Three people have built a mechanical worldview skin
Between, namely Francis Bacon, René Des Cartes and Isaac Newton
Ru. Moreover, we, about 40 years after that, are still based on their thinking.
I live ”
Until then, it was the fugitive that ruled out the principles for mechanical systems, excluding the view of the ancient Greek world.
In Lansis Bacon, he says, “Human life is not always full of new discoveries and potentials.
It must not be. Now the true goal of learning is nothing more than the standardization of the method. ”
The new method is “scientific methodology”. It is a bud of science universalism.
Subsequently, the mathematician René Des Cartes extended his universality theory of science and science by mathematical methodology.
The Then, Isa ′ ′ Kunewton constructed the world of physical mechanical systems by mathematical methods.
The Here, the theory of machine and science has become complete and inexorable.
It is the philosopher and political scientist of the United Kingdom who introduced this view of the mechanical world into sociology and economics.
John Locke (1632) and Adam Smith, a British economist
It was Su (one hundred seventy-one).
John Locke said, “It is the self-interest as L that personal wealth is social rich
Pursuing pure pursuit is the one and only way to form a better nation. People are,
Naturally, there is no problem as long as material greed is born strong or if we only increase the wealth of society
If so, society will be harmonized and improved, and there will be a society where people do not have to fight each other
He asserts that “Because nature is so blessed enough that it has enough power to be developed
I presume that it is from L leaving. Therefore,
It was about giving the people the freedom to produce wealth by the power of nature (science and technology).
It was
He tried to establish an economic theory in such a way as to reflect the general concept of the Newton system.
The Smith is the same as the astronomical object that moves according to the law of nature in the “National Wealth”, and the economy is
They also indicate similar behavior, and thus the most efficient way for economic organizations is to
It is arbitrariness, leaving the phenomenon as it is, so as not to disturb human behavior.
I suppose. Ro
I believed that I was satisfied. And, as it is natural, criticize personal desires or personal interests
Creating social barriers that impedes pursuit is considered to cause harm to society.
In other words, the desire to satisfy oneself as it is will eventually bring about the benefits of society.
Should not discourage efficient activities resulting from their desires, but rather the best economy
In principle, he argued that individuals should act in a selfish manner in order to overcome shortages
It is
“Everyone always finds the best possible employment for any capital that he can control
We are working hard to This is the very benefit of the individual, the benefit of the society to which the individual belongs
There is no. However, it is natural or rather inevitable to pursue the interests of oneself.
It will lead to the creation of the most profitable employment for society. “(Adam Smith” The Wealth of Nations “)
This view of the world represented by Adam Smith is still accepted as it is, and it
In the first place, it consists of two bases.
As John Locke said, “Nature is rich enough and we have to make sure that we have enough capacity to be developed.
“I think that I have left”. No, I believe that modern people have left jJ
Isn’t it? Because I believe so, applying the scientific principles of mechanics to machines and technology
As long as it is developed, this world is considered to be infinitely improved and improved, and to thrive. That
The driving force is, as Roet and Smith preached, the human material selfishness of humanity
It is the idea that it is developed to the limit.
Pursuing and realizing more material richness 2 is progress, and it is human ideal world
-. Thought is the world, science and technology can realize it completely. I am convinced.
It is these two.
You too may not have the same idea as this idea, or something close to it
However, this idea was completely “superstition” and “aspiration.”
This world view, which should bring humanity to the world of progress and prosperity, will actually push humanity to destruction and catastrophe
It was “thought of hell”.
It was “the law of entropy” that made it clear.
Entropy law
“The law of entropy” is the “law of thermodynamics”, but in this law of thermodynamics, “the first law”
There are “law” and “second law”.
The first law states that “the sum of matter and pre-energy in the universe is constant, and it is never created or disappears.
There is no such thing as In addition, the substance changes only in its form, the essence does not change. ”
That is the famous “Senseless Conservation Law”.
And the second law of thermodynamics, that is, the “law of entropy”, is expressed as
Be done. ‘
“Mass and energy change in one direction only, ie from usable to unusable
To or from available to unavailable or otherwise ordered
Change to a disordered thing.
About this “law of entropy”, Albert-Einsteich “entropy,
It is the first law for all sciences. Of all scientific laws, absolute law
It is considered as this, but it is this “law of entropy”.
Entropy is a type of measurement by which available pre-energy can be used
It can measure the degree of conversion to the impossible form. Therefore, increase entropy
The big means an increase in useless prewar energy. Two critical points indicated by this law
There is a One is that pre-engineering that has been used twice will no longer be usable. ”
One is that if an orderly thing is created somewhere on earth or in the universe,
That’s what is said to be a big disorder.
In the light of this law of entropy, the view of the world so far is completely superstitious
It became clear that it was an error.
First of all, natural resources in the world are limited, and science and technology
If you continue to use it, there are no resources to use on this planet
The
Any science and technology, using energy over and over again without exhausting energy
It is impossible to have a law. For example, burn coal. Although energy can be obtained, sulfur dioxide
Yellow and other gases are generated and diffuse into the air. Energy is lost in the process
However, once burned coal can not be burned again, and it is possible to gain much the same amount of work.
I can not do such a thing.
J. Lifkin explains this in “The Law of Entropy” as follows.
Above: “We have been able to develop just about the right technology for almost everything we use
For example, I think that it is possible to completely reproduce and use it first. But this is a mistake. Future-3
For this world to survive economically, promote cycling more efficiently.
It is essential to move forward and, needless to say, 100% reprocessing
It is also a fact that there is no way to do it.
For example, if you look at most of the used metals, as if you would like to make more money if you think about the soft drink
The average recycling efficiency is currently at 308 I cent. Further recycling
Energy, such as collection, transport, and processing of used materials.
The result is an increase in the overall entropy of the environment. Therefore, to recycle something new
Cost of energy that can be used by
Well,
“Even once used, it is possible to recycle, but it changes and changes every time
It must be prepared for “falling down” to go
Energy and substances are consumed, so in the end, there is nothing as a whole.
“For example, let’s assume that you take metal from the ground and then make some tools.
While this tool is present, metal molecules fly away constantly due to friction, fatigue, scratches, etc.
In addition, these liberated metal molecules never disappear, and eventually they dance in the soil.
I will return.
However, even if it returns to the soil, it will be scattered in the soil this time, so the original gold
It is no longer capable of doing useful work like lumps of metal ore. . Also, ‘y
A method to recycle all metal molecules scattered in the soil will be discovered in the future
It may also be said that in this whole process it is also
Always with increasing entropy in another dimension
However, the modern society blindly believes that science and technology can create unlimited tools for their convenience and prosperity.
